A Panthic Network - Khalsa Press Publication, ISSN: 1930-0107

PANTHIC.org


"ਲੱਗੀ ਧਮਕ ਸਾਰੇ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨ ਅੰਦਰ, ਦਿੱਲੀ, ਆਗਰੇ, ਹਾਂਸੀ ਹਸਾਰ ਮੀਆਂ। ਬੀਕਾਨੇਰ, ਲਖਨਊ, ਅਜਮੇਰ, ਜੈਪੁਰ, ਪਈਆਂ ਭਾਜੜਾਂ ਜਮਨਾ ਤੋਂ ਪਾਰ ਮੀਆਂ। ਚੱਲੀ ਸਭ ਪੰਜਾਬ ਦੀ ਬਾਦਸ਼ਾਹੀ, ਨਹੀਂ ਦਲਾਂ ਦਾ ਅੰਤ ਸ਼ੁਮਾਰ ਮੀਆਂ। ਸ਼ਾਹ ਮੁਹੰਮਦਾ ਕਿਸੇ ਨਾ ਅਟਕਣਾ ਈਂ, ਸਿੰਘ ਰਹਿਣਗੇ ਦਿੱਲੀ ਨੂੰ ਮਾਰ ਮੀਆਂ।(੬੩)"
- Shah Mohammed (Jangnama)

Truth Behind 1857, part 2

July 23, 2006
Source: Bijla Singh

Continuation of Part 1


War of Independence?

The main question still remains. Was the mutiny of 1857 an actual 'freedom fight' or war of independence?

The so-called 'freedom movement' was started by nearly 85 troops of a Bangali regiment on 9th May, 1857 in Merath. The cause of this insurgency was that the Enfield rifle ammunition had to be manually loaded before firing which involved biting the end of the cartridge, which was greased in pig fat and beef tallow. This was offensive to Hindus and Muslims alike, who considered tasting beef or pork to be against their respective religious tenets. This enraged both communities. Mangal Panday shot a British officer in Merath out of anger. This news spread all over the place which caused fights between Hindus Muslims and the British. Thus began the 'freedom movement'.

This was all due to religious reasons. No one had even a single bit of thought about India's independence. All Rajputs were divided and fighting each other. There was a lack of organization, and planning. There was no leader chosen by all communities. India was divided into many pieces of land among Hindus and Muslims.

The most important fact Hindu scholars ignore is that the lard was supplied by a Hindu Brahmin. According to Mr. Sain in 'Eighteen Fifty Seven', '..the lard was supplied by a Hindu Brahmin from Bengal. The government instructed to use lard of a goat or sheep but to save some money he used cow and pig instead.' Another fact that must be considered is that if the mutiny was in the protest of the cartridges then why did the Hindu and Muslim troops use the same weapons to fight their war?

According to many historians, 1857 was nothing but a senseless rebellion against the government.

Sir Jadoo Naath says, 'The Sepoy Mutiny was not a fight for freedom.'
Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'It was neither first nor national, nor a war of independence.'
Dr. Ganda Singh, 'Because of the lard cartridges many Hindu and Muslim troops became rebellious and killed many innocent people.'

The 'freedom fighters' shout the slogans of 'Long Live Bahadur Shah' in Delhi because they had chosen him as their leader. According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'They appointed Bahadur Shah as their leader because he was upset about the fact that British had seized his kingdom. He was against British but not in favor of kicking them out of India. He betrayed the rebellions and gave away all the secret information to lieutenant of Agra. The rebels insulted him for this action and appointed Prince Abu Bakar as their new leader.' Dr. R. C. Maujumdar further writes, 'Bahadur Shah tried to sign a peace treaty with the British on the condition that British would protect him physically and financially. He also promised to help the British if his son was appointed as the king of his seized kingdom.'

According to Dr. Ganda Singh, 'Army troops of Bahadur Shah refused to fight for him until their salaries were well paid.'

Now, what kind of freedom movement was this? On one hand they wanted freedom and on the other hand they wanted to get paid for their fight.The fight for freedom is not fought on monthly salaries. In fact, 1857 incident was nothing more than fight for personal gains.

According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'All the circumstances leave no doubt that Bahadur Shah and his family not only betrayed rebellions but the whole nation.'

There are many well known figures that played their part in this so-called mutiny. Nana Sahib of Maratha kingdom joined this mutiny for personal gains. He seized the British entrenchment in Kanpur and killed innocent women and children. The last king of Maratha, Bajee Rao, was given an annual pension of 8 million. He had no child. After his death the British refused to pay anyone else.

When the mutiny was at the highest peak, Nana Sahib requested to help British if they agreed to pay the pension but British refused. Nana Sahib had no choice but to join the mutiny. The British were unsuccessful in capturing him for 17 years. In 1874, Maharaja Sindhiya turned in Nana Sahib and Tantiya Tope to the British.

In this mutiny, the name of Rani Jhansi (Queen of Jhansi) is always discussed. Ignorant scholars give her credits for something she never did. There is not a single proof in existence that shows whether the Queen fought for freedom of the country or joined the mutiny on purpose.

Lakhshami Bayee, or Rani Jhansee, had no child of her own. Her husband was a characterless type of person who was responsible for his own death. Lakhshami Bayee wanted her adopted child, Damodar Rao, to become the next king however, the British were not happy with their misdeeds and refused to recognize her adopted child as the heir to the throne. She then wrote a letter to the British asking for a payment of one million rupee per year for her kingdom but the British did not agree. When that did not work, she asked for two hundred thousand but again the British refused. The only choice left for her was to fight and die. Her struggle was only for her own kingdom.

According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'After her unsuccessful efforts to appoint her adopted son as the next king, she started living her life as a Hindu widower wearing white clothes and spent much of her time in worship. All British scholars agree that neither had she planned anything for the freedom fight nor did she have any intentions of joining the mutiny in the first place.'

The rebels surrounded the Queen's palace. The queen informed the British that she had been insulted and mistreated by them and asked for help. Instead of helping her, the British blamed her for helping the rebels. Still, she remained loyal to the British.

Dr. Surinder Nath writes, 'Captain Gorden wrote to the queen asking for help.' In reply the queen wrote, 'What can I do? I am surrounded by the rebels. I have sent some guns and my army men for your help.'

According to Dr. G. W. Forrest, 'Queen Lakhashmee Bai secretly sent 50-60 guns, and 50 army men along with other weaponry.'

Dr. J. K. Kirapalani sums it up very well by saying, 'It was nothing but an attempt by the old order to get back their kingdoms.'

The above-mentioned examples and quotes of famous scholars clearly prove that the mutiny of 1857 was not a war of independence but a fight for personal gains. In summary, 1857 was not a war of independence because of some of the following reasons.

1. A united India did not exist at that time.

2. The rebellion remained confined to the ranks of the Bengal Army and in North-Central India.

3. The mutiny was put down with the help of other Indian soldiers from the Madras Army, the Bombay Army and the Sikh regiments.

4. Many princes and maharajas did not participate in the rebellion. Those that did were basically interested in reviving and reclaiming their own kingdoms, not creating a United India.

5. The Army and the Princes, who were the principal instigators of the rebellion of 1857, played no part in the Nationalist movement as it emerged in the 1880s.

Continued...

Excerpts taken from:
'Did Sikhs betray in 1857' by Professor Inder Singh
'Was the Indian slavery due to Sikh betrayal' by SSU


Views and opinion expressed in guest editorials/columns are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view or opinion of Panthic.org or Khalsa Press.

Comments

 

Disclaimer: Panthic.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the feedback from our readers, and cannot be held responsible for their views.

Declaring To Hunt Sikh Rights Violators - SFJ Challenges Extortion Allegations

Responding to the allegations of SFJ extorting money through filing human rights violation lawsuits in the US Court, attorney Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, legal advisor to SFJ stated that DSGMC officials GK and Sirsa "are under misconception that they can thwart the legal process in the United States also as they have been doing with impunity in Delhi and Punjab".
Read Full Article


RECENT ARTICLE & FEATURES

US Court Summons Served on Manjit GK, DSGMC President Amid Commotion

 

Amidst high drama marred by death threats and acts of violence by SAD (Badal) members, “Flash Point Investigators” (FPI) a New York based private investigator firm Served US Federal Court Summons on Manjit Singh G.K., President DSGMC....

Read Full Article

31 Years Later the Carnage Continues : Jammu Sikh Youth Killed in Cold-blood by Indian Police

 

A Sikh resident of Jammu Valley was shot in the head and killed by the Indian Police in cold-blood during a peaceful protest against the removal of posters depicting an image of Sant Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. Dozens of others protestors were reportedly injured during a clash between the Police and protesters....

Read Full Article

Shaheed Bhai Satwant Singh's Father Sardar Tarlok Singh Passes Away

 

Sardar Tarlok Singh, the respected father of the Mahan-Shaheed Bhai Satwant Singh, who along with Bhai Beant Singh and Bhai Kehar Singh, were responsible for bringing the Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi to justice, passed away at a hospital in Amritsar due to health related complications....

Read Full Article

California Assembly Recognizes 1984 Sikh Massacre

 

In an historic and unprecedented move, the California State Assembly has recognized the responsibility of the Indian government in the rape, torture and murder of thousands of Sikhs across India in November 1984....

Read Full Article

Canadian Sikhs Call on PM Harper to Raise Human Rights Concerns with India

 

The World Sikh Organization of Canada has called upon the Government of Canada to raise concerns with respect to human rights and freedom of religion with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi during his upcoming visit to Canada, next week. ...

Read Full Article

ਅਕਾਲ ਉਸਤਤਿ ਵਿਚ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦਾ ਸੰਕਲਪ

 

ਸਿੱਖ ਧਰਮ ਵਿਚ ਪੂਰਨ ਰੂਪ ਵਿਚ ‘ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ’ ਦੀ ਪ੍ਰੋੜ੍ਹਤਾ ਕਰਦਾ ਲਿਟਰੇਚਰ ਭਾਈ ਗੁਰਦਾਸ ਜੀ ਦੀਆਂ ਵਾਰਾਂ, ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗੋਬਿੰਦ ਸਿੰਘ ਜੀ ਦੁਆਰਾ ਰਚਿਤ ਬਾਣੀ ਅਤੇ ਭਾਈ ਨੰਦ ਲਾਲ ਰਚਨਾਵਲੀ ਆਦਿ ਸਤਿਕਾਰਤ ਰਚਨਾਵਾਂ ਨੂੰ ਅਹਿਮ ਉੱਚ ਸਥਾਨ ਪ੍ਰਾਪਤ ਹੈ। ‘ਜਾਪੁ ਸਾਹਿਬ’ ਤੋਂ ਬਾਅਦ ਦਸਮ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਵਿਚ ‘ਅਕਾਲ ਉਸਤਤਿ’ ਦੂਸਰੀ ਅੰਕਿਤ ਕੀਤੀ ਗਈ ਬਾਣੀ ਹੈ। ਉਸ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੀ ਹੋਂਦ ਧਿਆਨ ਵਿਚ ਰੱਖਦਿਆਂ ਇਸ ਰਚਨਾ ਵਿੱਚੋਂ ਉਸ ਅਕਾਲ ਪੁਰਖ ਦੇ ਸਰੂਪ ਨੂੰ ਵੇਖਣ ਦਾ ਯਤਨ ਕੀਤਾ ਗਿਆ ਹੈ। ...

Read Full Article

Stockton California Recognizes 1984 Sikh Genocide and Indian Persecution of Minorities

 

30-year-old massacre of Sikhs by the government of India gained fresh attention in California on Tuesday when the City of Stockton, home to the oldest community of Sikhs in the United States, passed a proclamation recognizing the 1984 Sikh Genocide and praising religious liberty....

Read Full Article

'Sikh Are not Hindus' Petition - White House Response Admits 'Religious Freedom' Issue In India

 

The White House issued an official response to rights group’s petition “Sikhs Are Not Hindus” stating that “During his recent trip to India, the President discussed the importance of religious freedom and tolerance in India on January 27 during his speech at Siri Fort in New Delhi”. ...

Read Full Article

US Sikh Rights Group Commends Obama’s Stand on Religious Freedom

 

While welcoming the US President’s reminder to India about the importance of religious freedom, Sikh For Justice (SFJ), which recently campaigned asking Obama to raise the issue of Article 25 (b), commended his stance on chances of India being splintering on religious lines, if they continue to deny religious freedom to the minorities....

Read Full Article