A Panthic Network - Khalsa Press Publication, ISSN: 1930-0107

PANTHIC.org


"ਸਾਹਿਬ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਗੁਰੂ ਗ੍ਰੰਥ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਜੀ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਕੁਫ਼ਰ ਤੋਲਣ ਵਾਲੇ, ਗੁਰੂ ਸਾਹਿਬਾਨ ਦੇ ਵਿਰੁੱਧ ਬੋਲਣ ਵਾਲੇ ਨੂੰ ਸੋਧਣਾ ਹਰ ਗੁਰਸਿੱਖ ਦਾ ਫ਼ਰਜ਼ ਹੈ। ਇਹੋ ਜਿਹੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਨੂੰ ਜੇ ਸਰਕਾਰ ਅਤਿਵਾਦੀ ਕਹਿੰਦੀ ਹੈ ਤਾਂ ਮੈਂ ਅਤਿਵਾਦੀ ਹਾਂ।"
- Bhai Ranjit Singh (Jathedar Sri Akal Takht Sahib)

Truth Behind 1857, part 2

July 23, 2006
Source: Bijla Singh

Continuation of Part 1


War of Independence?

The main question still remains. Was the mutiny of 1857 an actual 'freedom fight' or war of independence?

The so-called 'freedom movement' was started by nearly 85 troops of a Bangali regiment on 9th May, 1857 in Merath. The cause of this insurgency was that the Enfield rifle ammunition had to be manually loaded before firing which involved biting the end of the cartridge, which was greased in pig fat and beef tallow. This was offensive to Hindus and Muslims alike, who considered tasting beef or pork to be against their respective religious tenets. This enraged both communities. Mangal Panday shot a British officer in Merath out of anger. This news spread all over the place which caused fights between Hindus Muslims and the British. Thus began the 'freedom movement'.

This was all due to religious reasons. No one had even a single bit of thought about India's independence. All Rajputs were divided and fighting each other. There was a lack of organization, and planning. There was no leader chosen by all communities. India was divided into many pieces of land among Hindus and Muslims.

The most important fact Hindu scholars ignore is that the lard was supplied by a Hindu Brahmin. According to Mr. Sain in 'Eighteen Fifty Seven', '..the lard was supplied by a Hindu Brahmin from Bengal. The government instructed to use lard of a goat or sheep but to save some money he used cow and pig instead.' Another fact that must be considered is that if the mutiny was in the protest of the cartridges then why did the Hindu and Muslim troops use the same weapons to fight their war?

According to many historians, 1857 was nothing but a senseless rebellion against the government.

Sir Jadoo Naath says, 'The Sepoy Mutiny was not a fight for freedom.'
Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'It was neither first nor national, nor a war of independence.'
Dr. Ganda Singh, 'Because of the lard cartridges many Hindu and Muslim troops became rebellious and killed many innocent people.'

The 'freedom fighters' shout the slogans of 'Long Live Bahadur Shah' in Delhi because they had chosen him as their leader. According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'They appointed Bahadur Shah as their leader because he was upset about the fact that British had seized his kingdom. He was against British but not in favor of kicking them out of India. He betrayed the rebellions and gave away all the secret information to lieutenant of Agra. The rebels insulted him for this action and appointed Prince Abu Bakar as their new leader.' Dr. R. C. Maujumdar further writes, 'Bahadur Shah tried to sign a peace treaty with the British on the condition that British would protect him physically and financially. He also promised to help the British if his son was appointed as the king of his seized kingdom.'

According to Dr. Ganda Singh, 'Army troops of Bahadur Shah refused to fight for him until their salaries were well paid.'

Now, what kind of freedom movement was this? On one hand they wanted freedom and on the other hand they wanted to get paid for their fight.The fight for freedom is not fought on monthly salaries. In fact, 1857 incident was nothing more than fight for personal gains.

According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'All the circumstances leave no doubt that Bahadur Shah and his family not only betrayed rebellions but the whole nation.'

There are many well known figures that played their part in this so-called mutiny. Nana Sahib of Maratha kingdom joined this mutiny for personal gains. He seized the British entrenchment in Kanpur and killed innocent women and children. The last king of Maratha, Bajee Rao, was given an annual pension of 8 million. He had no child. After his death the British refused to pay anyone else.

When the mutiny was at the highest peak, Nana Sahib requested to help British if they agreed to pay the pension but British refused. Nana Sahib had no choice but to join the mutiny. The British were unsuccessful in capturing him for 17 years. In 1874, Maharaja Sindhiya turned in Nana Sahib and Tantiya Tope to the British.

In this mutiny, the name of Rani Jhansi (Queen of Jhansi) is always discussed. Ignorant scholars give her credits for something she never did. There is not a single proof in existence that shows whether the Queen fought for freedom of the country or joined the mutiny on purpose.

Lakhshami Bayee, or Rani Jhansee, had no child of her own. Her husband was a characterless type of person who was responsible for his own death. Lakhshami Bayee wanted her adopted child, Damodar Rao, to become the next king however, the British were not happy with their misdeeds and refused to recognize her adopted child as the heir to the throne. She then wrote a letter to the British asking for a payment of one million rupee per year for her kingdom but the British did not agree. When that did not work, she asked for two hundred thousand but again the British refused. The only choice left for her was to fight and die. Her struggle was only for her own kingdom.

According to Dr. R. C. Maujumdar, 'After her unsuccessful efforts to appoint her adopted son as the next king, she started living her life as a Hindu widower wearing white clothes and spent much of her time in worship. All British scholars agree that neither had she planned anything for the freedom fight nor did she have any intentions of joining the mutiny in the first place.'

The rebels surrounded the Queen's palace. The queen informed the British that she had been insulted and mistreated by them and asked for help. Instead of helping her, the British blamed her for helping the rebels. Still, she remained loyal to the British.

Dr. Surinder Nath writes, 'Captain Gorden wrote to the queen asking for help.' In reply the queen wrote, 'What can I do? I am surrounded by the rebels. I have sent some guns and my army men for your help.'

According to Dr. G. W. Forrest, 'Queen Lakhashmee Bai secretly sent 50-60 guns, and 50 army men along with other weaponry.'

Dr. J. K. Kirapalani sums it up very well by saying, 'It was nothing but an attempt by the old order to get back their kingdoms.'

The above-mentioned examples and quotes of famous scholars clearly prove that the mutiny of 1857 was not a war of independence but a fight for personal gains. In summary, 1857 was not a war of independence because of some of the following reasons.

1. A united India did not exist at that time.

2. The rebellion remained confined to the ranks of the Bengal Army and in North-Central India.

3. The mutiny was put down with the help of other Indian soldiers from the Madras Army, the Bombay Army and the Sikh regiments.

4. Many princes and maharajas did not participate in the rebellion. Those that did were basically interested in reviving and reclaiming their own kingdoms, not creating a United India.

5. The Army and the Princes, who were the principal instigators of the rebellion of 1857, played no part in the Nationalist movement as it emerged in the 1880s.

Continued...

Excerpts taken from:
'Did Sikhs betray in 1857' by Professor Inder Singh
'Was the Indian slavery due to Sikh betrayal' by SSU


Views and opinion expressed in guest editorials/columns are of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view or opinion of Panthic.org or Khalsa Press.

Comments

 

Disclaimer: Panthic.org does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions voiced in the feedback from our readers, and cannot be held responsible for their views.

Sikh Nation Honors Shaheeds Beant Singh and Satwant Singh

The Sikh Nation honored the sacrifices of their National Heroes, Shaheed Sardar Beant Singh and Satwant Singh who brought Indira Gandhi to justice on October 31st, 1984 for authorizing the brutal military assault on Sri Darbar Sahib complex, and dozens of other Sikh Gurdwaras across Punjab in which thousands of innocent Sikh men, women, and children were killed.
Read Full Article
RECENT ARTICLE & FEATURES

First Turbaned Sikh Woman in Canadian Navy a Milestone: WSO

 

The World Sikh Organization of Canada has helped Master Seaman Wanda McDonald, a Sonar operator, become the first Sikh woman to wear the turban while serving in the Royal Canadian Navy (RCN). ...

Read Full Article

Punjab Police Opens Fire on Sikhs Protesting Noormehl Cult

 

The Punjab police reportedly opened fire on a crowd of Sikhs who had gathered in the village of Jodhpur to protest the activities of a Noormehal based controversial sect. The police firing injured several of the Sikh protesters on the scene. ...

Read Full Article

Bachchan Summoned By Los Angeles Court - 1984 Call of 'Violence Against Sikhs' in Question

 

Bollywood mega star Amitabh Bachchan has been summoned by Los Angeles Federal Court for instigating the 1984 call for violence against the Sikh community. Bachchan is accused of raising “blood for blood” slogan on 31st October 1984 after Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was shot dead by her two bodyguards who happened to be Sikhs....

Read Full Article

Canadian Sikh Organizations Issue Statements on Ottowa Terrorist Attack, Commend Action of Sgt. Kevin Vickers.

 

BC Sikh Gurdwara Council and the World Sikh Organization of Canada reacted to the terrorist attacks in Ottawa in which Cpl. Nathan Cirillo, a 24 year old reservist with the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders regiment lost his life in the shooting at the Ottawa War Memorial....

Read Full Article

Manjit GK - Chief Guest of Malik, Satnam Trust, Grilled by Sangat, Sikh Activists

 

On the heels of the controversy regarding the beadbi of transporting over 400 sacred Saroops of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji via a commercial ship, Satnam Education Society, and it’s director Ripudaman Singh Malik raked up further criticism by inviting and hosting Manjit Singh GK, the leader of Delhi’s Shiromani Akali Dal (Badal) as a “special guest” during the grand opening of Khalsa Secondary School in Surrey. ...

Read Full Article

Beadbi of Saroops: Outrage Against Malik and Satnam Society

 

The Satnam Education Society of BC along with its director Ripudaman Singh Malik is once again amidst controversy after it was discovered that over four hundred sacred saroops of Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji that were ordered by the them were being stored in a bus at a Vancouver port pending customs clearance. ...

Read Full Article

Sikh Group Convenes ''Citizens' Court'' to Indict Modi - Launches Advocacy Campaign In Washington

 

On September 30, while President Obama will be laying red carpet for Modi at the White House, a Citizens' Court convened by human rights group ''Sikhs For Justice'' (SFJ) will hold indictment proceedings against the Indian Prime Minister. The proceedings before Citizens Court will be telecast live throughout the United States by the Sikh rights group....

Read Full Article

Manmohan Singh Immune As PM, Not As Finance Minister, From Claims Of Sikh killings: US Court

 

US District Judge Honorable James Boasberg in the District of Columbia ruled that former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is immune from claims that he supported the genocide of Sikhs during his tenure as head of the country but does not have "head of state immunity" for claims arising from his tenure as Finance Minister of India (1991-1996)....

Read Full Article

Neo-Khalistani Lobby Desperately Trying to Salvage Disgraced Kathavachak

 

On May 11, 2014, Panthic.org (Khalsa Press) published a news article regarding well-known ‘missionary’ kathavachak Shivteg Singh after he was discovered having an illicit affair with a married bibi Dhadhi group member during his visit at Ontario Khalsa Darbar, popularly known as Dixie Gurdwara. ...

Read Full Article